Crazy or genius ideas: Individual Carbon Emissions Cap (I)

This marks the start of a new series of posts that, from now on, will share the blog's spotlight together with the habitual posts analyzing the situation of the global economy. These series will be far more subjective than the economic analysis posts, I will just expose some ideas that cross my mind. That means I could incur in some inaccuracies from time to time, so take it with a grain of salt. 

When there is so much talk about carbon emissions, lowering carbon footprints, global warming, the problem with fossil fuels, etc. what if  we began helping by setting a yearly CO2 quantity that people are allowed to emit? I am talking about creating an "Individual Carbon Emissions Cap", similarly to what it is done with industrial emissions as stated by the Kyoto Protocol but taking it a step further by making citizens part of it. 

What does this mean? Every participant country would set an Individual Carbon Emissions Cap (from now on I will call this ICEC for clarity's sake) for its citizens; a defined number of kilograms of CO2 that one person was allowed to emit to the environment over a year. For some people ICEC would instantly become an asset, for others it would mean a new tax, but in any case a tax you have control over... People would be able to trade part of their ICEC on a newly-defined public market (obviously with fixed prices per year to avoid the speculating vultures from spoiling the idea) and they could also make their cap grow by planting trees, sharing cars, installing or buying energy efficient devices and similar tree-hugger 'activities'. 

And now Portugal... But hunters already looking for their next prey

Here comes the latest member (it is almost there) to join the euro-bailout club: Portugal. This is not breaking news, as everybody was expecting this to happen sooner or later. It is not frightening either, as Portuguese contribution to the whole European GDP is relatively low; it is lower than that of the Irish and clearly the eurozone did not break because of Ireland's (or Greece's) bailout. Belgium is mentioned too, but that would not pose a much bigger problem than Portugalm, but what IS frightening economists worldwide is the possibility of Spain or Italy being next.

Portugal 10-year Bond. Credit: Bloomberg

The pattern on European bailouts is becoming worryingly clear. One country's economy begins showing signs of slowing down and continues with its excessive debt issuing. Rating agencies notice (thus making the yields go up), international investors notice (and ask for bigger yields on said sovereign bond) and last but not least speculators notice and try to take advantage of the situation. The death spiral has begun and everybody knows the results... The same moment this happens, the whole financial world locks in to their next target; the most suitable candidates being now Spain and Italy. The first expression that comes to mind when mixing the word 'bailout' and the name of Spain is 'too big too fail'. The expression is already familiar for American people but European people have not suffered it yet. The falls of Greece and Ireland were manageable for the European rescue fund, but a crash in Spain, or Italy, would pose an enormous problem to the whole eurozone. But disregarding what the hunters (speculators) want, is really Spain in need of a bailout? 

The tsunami reach on the global economy

On previous posts we have done a brief analysis on the devastating effects of the earthquake-tsunami combo on the Japanese economy. To have a more general and complete view of the events, one has to look at the other side of the story too, the collateral effects the damage suffered by Japan will have on the global economy. Over the last days we have heard words of relief from Japan's government and from analysts saying that the bite on Japanese GDP will not be as big as thought on first instance. But, no matter how fast the world's third biggest economy can recover from the disaster, the weight of said economy makes it impossible to dismiss the effects it  will have in the coming months (and is having as of now) on the march of the global economy.

Countries affected

The first wave to affect the global economy was a logic fund repatriation, specially from Japanese banks and insurance companies in need of liquidity to begin with reconstruction tasks at home. This initial repatriation made the yen go higher instead of immediately falling as expected, but this is not something to fear specially for the rest of the world. What some people are fearing is that Japanese mutual funds, hedge funds and instruments alike began to massively withdraw their positions over the rest of the world to take their money back home. If this movement is done gradually no significant damage would be done, Japanese money would simply be substituted by somebody else's money. But if this repatriation was to be done massively it would pose an important threat, specially for emerging markets. Emerging markets usually rely on bigger economies' capital to fund their growth, to the point where a runaway of Japanese money could partly derail short-term growth expectations for some emerging markets. I am not talking China, Russia or Brazil here which are exposed but big enough to not notice a heavy change. I am talking about smaller markets like South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Malaysia, Thailand, South Africa or Chile.

Uphill battle for Japan. How can they fight it?

While the situation is extremely tense in Japan at the moment with all eyes set on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant, the Japanese markets are open and the obvious, not ethic at all but expected nonetheless, has happened. The Nikkei plummeted more than 11% in the earthquake's aftermath just to regain more than 5% today. Japan is now officially the playground for avid speculators and this can do no good to the forthcoming Japan recovery. 

It is quite difficult to ask for stability in the markets when the country itself is still (literally) shaking, but investors and speculators should leave Japan some room to breath, for the greater good. Japan is still one of the biggest economies worldwide; playing against it just to make some easy money now is quite a stupid, short-sighted and naive thing to do and could have heavy consequences in the future. But we know human stupidity is second only to human greed, and that you cannot expect nothing good from the same people that invented subprime-mortgage-backed securities and thus brought the world economy to its knees... So let us analyze what Japan can do from here on.

Credit: Yahoo! Finance

Japan's instruments for recovery
Japan's economy is one of a kind, after booming heavily during the eighties, it entered a phase the Japanese call "The lost decade", stagflation after their asset bubble burst has plagued the economy since then. The global crisis we have been suffering since 2008 has not helped Japan totally get out of their slump at all, even though before said crisis Japan showed promising signs of recovery with GDP growths better than Europe or the US. Still, Japan is the world's third biggest economy after USA and China so it will not be bare-handed through its long, hard, recovery.

Japan's earthquake biggest replica: the economic one

First of all, my thoughts are with the Japanese people in these difficult moments. I am sure being such a hard-working, disciplined and respectful country they will have no (unmanageable) problems getting over it very soon. 

Earthquakes as big as the one that hit Japan last night are always followed by numerous replicas of different strength. These replicas can last for several days until the tectonic plates 'settle down' again. Well, we have begun to see what can be the biggest and more widespread replicas of said earthquake: the economic one. Few hours have passed since the disaster and we can already see the effects on the markets: oil prices, gold and stocks go steeply down and the german bond and the US dollar go up. Pure textbook reaction.

ECB raising interest rates. Damage control?

Take a quick look at the news an see how many times the expression 'raising tensions' appears on articles lately when talking about the situation in the Middle East. I am sure you do not have enough fingers to count them... Now take this same expression but exchange the word 'tensions' by 'interest rates' and see everybody panic and run for their lives. Although we have lived (and we are still living) one of history's longest period of low interest rates, people keep asking for more. Governments and enterprises around the world have grown so accustomed to debt issuing and uncontrolled spending thanks to cheap money that mentioning the slightest interest rate hike makes them shiver.

The key factors to justify a (slight) interest rates raise are all there though: we have growing core inflation, uncontrolled energy prices, excessive debt and severely depreciated currencies. On the other side we have a weak, mostly artificial recovery (already mentioned), that depends heavily on the availability of cheap money. Which side has a more important impact on the future status of the economy? It is clearly the first one, no hesitation. The Middle East turmoil is not coming to an end soon, and until it does the oil barrel price will keep rising, putting even more pressure on inflation control measures.

More inflation in the actual scenario we are facing would kill all recovery aspirations on the medium and long-term, even if it now seems detrimental for the short-term.

Do not get me wrong, as of now, a raise in interest rates will be hard to handle, specially for debt-burdened countries like Greece, Ireland or Portugal. It would be bad for Spain too even if its debt situation is marginally better, because all the semi-public savings banks (called 'Cajas de Ahorros') are now undergoing reforms to transform themselves into normal banks. A process that needs, and will need, a lot of funding and bond issuing on their part. For these troubled countries higher interest rates mean only one thing: more expensive financing, that is all they can think of when they hear these words.

The US Dollar not-so-free fall

When talking about international trading and investing everybody has grown accustomed to the same face, the US Dollar. It was at the core of any transaction, it denominated almost all the financial instruments you could think of and it was the shelter everybody looked for when things got ugly (this last one was shared with gold obviously). But this familiar face seems to be aging quickly for a number of reasons and, most importantly, it does not seem to care about it.

This omnipresence of the USD has always been key for the US economy, as it has allowed for the US to issue more and more debt at quite low prices independently of the markets situation. The perceived-risk of the US debt had always been very low (notice the past tense here). The US government of course knew this, and used it on its favor but they have been using the strategy for too long and too hard. As it happens with everything, if you overuse and stress something for long enough, it breaks...

EUR-USD exchange rate. Credit: Yahoo!